True Reasons Iraq Was Invaded

86

By TonyDan

American soldiers engaged in battle in Iraq
American soldiers engaged in battle in Iraq

It has been six years since America Invaded Iraq and overthrew the government of Saddam Hussein. In that time more than 4300 U.S. servicemen have lost their lives and nearly 10,000 have been wounded.

The death toll among Iraqi civilians is estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands with dozens more continuing to be killed every week.

With so much death and destruction along with a blurred objective for the war many Americans have wondered "should we be in Iraq at all?"

The Bush administration initially went to war with Iraq because they were said to be an eminent danger to the Middle East region and the world as a whole. Saddam Hussein was suspected of possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMD's) which it was feared that he might use against neighboring countries.

The fear grew out of an incident after the Persian Gulf War in which Hussein used chemical weapons against The Kurdish religious sect that lived in the northern region of Iraq. Several hundred Kurds were killed or badly injured in the attack.

Shortly after September 11, President George W. Bush declared a war on terror which meant any person or nation suspected of terrorist activity against the United States would be subject to punishment, including imprisonment if found to be cooperating with terrorists.

Under the precept of America's war on terror, the Bush administration accused Saddam Hussein of sponsoring terrorist training facilities in Iraq. This, combined with the danger that he posed by possessing weapons of mass destruction, in the eyes of the Bush administration made him a target for the war on terror.

Only months after beginning the Afghanistan War, President Bush and his advisers started making plans to invade Iraq and on March 1, 2003 those plans were carried out.

It has been six-plus years since the invasion. Much of the country lays in ruins with many communities still without basic services like water and electricity. With the recent comments by former vice president Dick Cheney that he does not believe that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11 we find oueselves asking the question "Why did we invade Iraq?"

There are three reasons that stand out to me.

Old Standing Vendetta

It was widely reported that Saddam Hussein had made a plan to assassinate the elder George (H.W.) Bush after the Persian Gulf War. The plan was thwarted but it was rumored that George W. Bush still held a grudge. It was speculated that September 11 provided the younger Bush the opportunity to strike back at Hussein and he took it.

Whether this is true or not is up to speculation but one thing is for certain, it was a strange manuever to suddenly turn from the war in Afghanistan and the hunt for Osama Bin Laden the one responsible for 9/11 and then direct more than 100,000 troops to invade Iraq who for all intent and purpose was occupying a nuetral position.

No weapons of mass destruction were ever found and just recently it was admitted by some former members of the Bush administration that none probably ever existed.

Easy Target

Beside the fact that Saddam Hussein was accused of being affiliated with terrorists, he was an easy target.

The Bush administration knew that Hussein's army was no match for the United States armed forces. They knew that they could roll over Iraq's National Army like a soda can and that's exactly what they did.

In a matter of two months President Bush was standing on the deck of the carrier USS Abraham giving what amounted to, a victory speech under a banner that read "Mission Accomplished."

The banner proved to be premature however. Since that time a rebel insurgency of Saddam Hussein loyalists have waged a violent war against U.S. forces up until the recent troop withdrawal to allow Iraqi Security Forces to take control of the country.

Oil Revenues

There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that the primary reason that we invaded Iraq was for the oil. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the number one consumer of oil in the world would invade an oil bearing country.

Iraq rich oil supplies made it a place of great interest to the United States.

When the U.S. invaded Iraq one of the presumptions by the Bush advisors, was that America would be greeted as liberators and embraced by the people of Iraq.

It probably is not too far of a stretch to believe that the Bush administration thought that within the gratitude of the Iraqi people there would be some oil. After all, we freed you from a ruthless dictator who reigned over you in a regime of violence.

As it turned out, the Iraqi people did not greet the Americans as liberators but as trespassers and wanted them out of their country as soon as possible. This response was a slap in the face of the Bush White House but more importantly the American soldiers who bleed and died for their freedom.

At this posting U.S. troops have withdrawn out of all major Iraqi cities leaving The Iraqi Security Forces in charge.

American soldiers and their families have paid a high price for the invasion of Iraq and so have the Iraqi people.

The reasons that we were given for invading Iraq by the Bush administration have obviously been proven to be false. It is nothing less than criminal, what the Bush White House subjected the people of Iraq and the citizens of America to endure.

We may never know the true reason for the invasion of Iraq but one thing is for certain, someone knows and until they tell us we can only speculate.

Comments

MNichopolis profile image

MNichopolis 2 years ago

While you get some of the reasons behind the reasons, the main "formal" reason cited at the time, that I recall, was UN Security Council resolution 1441.

Ostensibly all this had to do with weapons of mass destruction (which weren't found in large quantities). Nonetheless, Iraq was NOT cooperating with the UN inspectors.

It seems this would leave the world two choices;

- Do nothing, and let the UN fade into oblivion - a lion, roaring at the world, but having no teeth.

- Enforce the UN policies

While this is certainly oversimplifying the real reasons the US invaded Iraq, they were definitely the reasons the Bush administration espoused at the time.

Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds Level 6 Commenter 2 years ago

I don't recall that any WMD were found. Second, the people who supported the invasion of Iraq were not big supporters of the United Nations, except when it could be manipulated, in their opinion, to our advantage. At the time Bush and Cheney espoused two main reasons--Saddam Hussein's alleged ties to Al Qaeda which was a lie and the neocon's foolish hope that Iraq could be turned into a democratic model for the Middle East which was a fool's errand. Of course allowing the big U.S. international oil companies to get their hands on Iraq's oil was a major unspoken motive.

What was the result? 4,400 American soldiers killed and many more wounded; 100,000 Iraqis killed; a magnet and training ground for terrorists from throughout the Middle East was created; women's rights took a big step backward; about a third of Iraqi Christians have beene driven out of the country by Shiite Muslim fanatics; and the Iraq government was put in the hands of Shiite Muslims friendly to Iran, thus, losing a counterweight to Iran in the region. Finally, the Iraq War, by the end of 2009 will have cost $694 billion which is more than the Vietnam War and a major contributor to the Bush deficits.

TonyDan profile image

TonyDan Hub Author 2 years ago

could not agree with you more.

good show.

JJ 21 months ago

Weak article, you have gone with the some of the selling points but not the central purpose. Iraq was chosen for both convenience and probablility of success. The central goal of the invasion of Iraq stems from theories developed back in the 90's regarding stabilization of the middle east. The thought at the time was that a freedom based government (not necessarily democratic) could have large impact on neighboring oppressed populace. Iraq was already one of the more progressive countries in the region in regards to female equality. Hence the belief that liklihood for success would be greater there. On top of that, Saddam foolishly thought he could use WMD as a deterrent whether he had any or not, making the case for war much easier than saying we want to go in and change the culture to a more progressive and like minded mentality. The central core idea was that once freedom took hold it would spread into neighboring countries and create revolutions from within. The internal revolts were considered the only true chance at changing the culture of the region. (Change through military intervention seen as remote). If I remember right, the theories generally expected lasting change to take one to two generations, or 30 to 50 years. Similar to what we have seen in our own country with suffrage or civil rights etc. It has been a cluster .... for the most part but still stands a chance of working over time. Now everyone knows the true reason, although if one listened carefully you could have heard this explained prior to the war. Dont get lost in all the "selling points" for going to war, because that is all they were. You may call it a "fools errand" to believe it may work but the opposite choice of waiting for a fully nuclear region was far from an option to be explored. Oh and 9/11 was nothing more than a catalyst for action, the plans had been considered for a long time before that took place.

Hmrjmr1 profile image

Hmrjmr1 Level 3 Commenter 20 months ago

Tony - JJ is correct.

Johannes Johannes 6 months ago

I read on the web that the real reason was that SH intended to trade Iraq's oil in Euro's.

Any Thoughts ?

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Do you think America should have gone to war with Iraq?

    • yes
    • no
    • not sure
    • don't know
    • don't care one way or the other
    See results without voting
    On the Hunt in Baghdad
    Amazon Price: $0.99
    The Forever War (Vintage)
    Amazon Price: $5.31
    List Price: $15.95
    Ambush Alley: The Most Extraordinary Battle of the Iraq War
    Amazon Price: $4.27
    List Price: $7.99
    Ghosts of War: The True Story of a 19-Year-Old GI
    Amazon Price: $4.90
    List Price: $8.99
    Please wait working